The model of hierarchical complexity is a mathematical behavior model that
defines discreet orders (also called stages) of increasing behavioral
complexity. Each order of complexity is produced by the coordination of two
or more actions at the previous order. The orders are domain-general,
universal forms of behavior. There are 8 transition steps between each
stage, and they are for fractally identical. And yes, it does apply at all
building blocks of social organization, although the calculus to adequately
represent it becomes profoundly complex.
It is primarily quantitative, not qualitative and therefore not analogy
based. However, analogies can be made in so far as an order of hierarchical
complexity has been identified to be the same between two or more
behaviors, so the characteristics that are shared between those behaviors
can be related.
The paper explicitly articulate the fundamental behavioral complexity
required to resolve the current issues that are occurring right now. The
problem is, most people hit a ceiling at formal or systematic stage, and in
order for people to resolve the issues, they need to be no less then meta
systematic stage, which consists of about 5% of the population. This is
because the solution requires the coordination and synthesis of homomorphic
principles that govern systems.
Democracy was designed specifically for this purpose, for people to come
together from different perspectives and design, append, and amend higher
order principles (laws) to govern systems. Unfortunately, the systems have
been corrupted. This is because almost all of the participants in economic,
political, and corporate systems who can perform meta systematically, are
stuck in the negation or oscillation transition steps, which is what
metamodernism is an attempt to help solve.
You cannot resolve the corruption directly. It does not work. Corrupt
organizations consist of people who will understand your method for trying
to prevent their corruption, and they will adapt to stop you.
Anti-corruption only put Band-Aids on a larger problem. The paper I linked
works, but only if you can get people to sit at the same table in good
faith. And we don't see it happen very often. We need something more to
solve these problems, but we don't have it yet.
C.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020, 1:19 AM James Lyons-Weiler <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
>
> Thank you Cory, theirs (Sonnert & Commons') is a analogy-based general
> theoretical framework but I'm afraid in my view it falls
> short (as all analogies and models do to some extent) because it attempts
> to apply and extend a model developed to understand
> an aspect of the developing human brain, which society is not, and thus is
> cannot succeed in providing much more
> than a descriptive framework.
>
> RIght now, I'm more along the lines of "If we are asked to hang those
> responsible, who are they, and what do we call them" (hanging being a
> metaphor) and "once the king is dead, who shall be king (if anyone), and
> how shall we live"? And "do we want to be informed or participate?"
>
> Take Greenspan's awakening, for example.
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.theguardian.com_business_2008_oct_24_economics-2Dcreditcrunch-2Dfederal-2Dreserve-2Dgreenspan&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=rqEHa_BdHbaKo18DygXZaFb-8x5HuG1530LgKf4EESo&s=_Q-bkV2PSIKSLoPVatKnRgBLzjjajSwJ7G6Wen8gvVE&e=
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.theguardian.com_business_2008_oct_24_economics-2Dcreditcrunch-2Dfederal-2Dreserve-2Dgreenspan&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=D-9ZbkJ3UKJEqsE3Xl0MZ4WVjgIoHLzqIgKsT1Zylng&s=_d3QKD3iGMOSBKKVcI4PDm2FY7wggfASObJQ1wc65K8&e=>
>
>
> How could a society structure its economy on a model of infinite growth in
> the first place?
> A presumption that based on interest in one's own resources, one would
> take good care of them and shepherd them well - with no
> built-in safe guard for someone to sound an alarm, and practiced routine
> of changed behavior that would allow a gentle
> slide into a recession. We don't have any such safeguards, and this is
> why in 2008 I called and wrote to Hank Paulson (Sec.
> Treasury) from my office at the University of Pittsburgh the Friday before
> Black Monday, pleading for him to use all
> carrot and no stick, lest a lending freeze hold the bail-out money for
> months. My solution was a sliding scale incentive plan:
> The lower the interest rate banks offered to consumers, the larger the
> size of the bailout a bank could obtain, and the better
> the terms of the payback (longer terms, lower interest) to the Fed.
>
> Equitably incentivized transactions at such times would appear to me to
> dictate such terms - not further trust in
> the survival instincts of drowning institutions.
>
> Paulson ignored my pleas, instead he forced banks to accept bail-out
> they did not need to "legitimize" the loans.
>
> The banks froze for 3 three months, and millions lost their homes.
>
> The absence of creative thought in economic modeling - in spite of
> trillions of dollars worth of computers and software in which
> simulations could be run to find good outcomes - to me an example of is
> symptomatic of a larger pathology; parameterizing a strategy (and its
> models) to an end that serves as a means to its own ends *because doing
> so sanctifies the authority*.
>
> As base as that may seem, Left and Right have no meaning if their
> shuffling of platforms are based on
> multivariate versions of "Split the country and take the bigger half",
> which they are. They are based on projections of surrogate outcomes
> (elections) not long-term health of the country, economy, etc. I'm
> convinced the two parties would survive quite well side by
> side regardless of the type of economy or (nearly) government that ruled
> the US.
>
> So who is culpable for not imagining and sharing such better ways? Surely
> they have been imagined?
>
> Is it the drama players themselves?
> The witting and unwitting electorate?
>
> Are there meta-influences who ride the ebbing political waves like an
> investor
> who knows how to make money when the stock market both rises and falls?
>
> Or do societies flail - and fail - from the emergent properties of
> self-serving nature of humans, who see fit to limit
> themselves to conformed mold?
>
> Something else?
>
> Does for-profit medicine lead to medical injuries being the 3rd leading
> cause of death by institutional negligence, or
> personal callous disregard? More importantly - what do we do NOW to
> address it?
>
> Reflect for a moment on why we so thoroughly enmesh our identities with
> our positions, and why are we not warned (and do not warn those
> we mentor) that to do so means risk of suffering an unwarranted crisis
> should your position change?
>
> I imagine that there are many, many axes of morality - defined by their
> ability to render useful and not harmful process solutions, which
> sit right before us, but to which we are blinded by our socialization and
> education:
>
> *-Conformity to the majority*
> *-Appeal to (or deference) to authority*
> *-Vague, inexact or unestimated "greater good" cost/benefit calculations *
>
> I'm sure everyone can extend this list of behaviors that become "default
> mode" operations that may have worked
> optimally in our tribal and small village past.
>
> But now, we confuse "principles" with "process solutions". Principles are
> subjective and experience-based, and
> often outmoded by a rapidly changing world.
>
> Principles are held onto dearly, and in staying with them are left
> unscathed by later-life experience.
>
> Process solutions are continuously optimized via intelligence and tested
> by objective empirical evidence.
>
> "Principles" can collide and cause societal conflict. "Process solutions"
> cannot collide, they can only enmesh and adjust to each
> other toward some optimal solution.
>
> There are many possible outcomes for tomorrow given where we stand today.
> Are we forbidden or
> constrained from using the full suite of tools we have mastered to
> envision a peaceful, creative, caring, even loving future?
>
> I don't know if you've noticed but there is a rising tide of
> anti-scientism in the US - and it is not anti-science by any means.
>
> In part that is because those who call for objective science remain
> heralded (for better or worse).
>
> My overt concern (not yet a fear) is a restructuring based on partial
> comprehension of science, sociology, psychology,
> education, economics, and that we may fall short of a society that
> preserves liberties and freedom that permit
> evolution or even free expression in these areas.
>
> My fear is that the collective academe in the US will wake up too slowly
> to the reality that at 16.8% of our GDP, 3,600
> billion dollars are spent on (largely) for-profit healthcare; that means
> that 1/6 dollars are being spent on for-profit medicine, and
> the cost of healthcare is expected to rise dramatically. How will we pay
> for the rest of what is needed to have a functioning
> society?
>
> Most importantly I think is what process solutions can be envisioned to
> reform an unsustainable model based on infinite growth?
>
> And what other sectors are pathological at this time, and what process
> solutions might exist to help them improve as well?
>
> I don't think we can expect all of the answers here, but surely some
> answers must exist.
>
> JLW
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 12:13 AM Cory David Barker <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Read Sonnert and Commons
>>
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.google.com_url-3Fsa-3Dt-26source-3Dweb-26rct-3Dj-26url-3Dhttps-3A__files.eric.ed.gov_fulltext_ED348600.pdf-26ved-3D2ahUKEwiPzMLk-2DtrqAhXELH0KHS5ZAs4QFjABegQIBBAB-26usg-3DAOvVaw1LOvMInu3N1o9iEJvVY8YB&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=rqEHa_BdHbaKo18DygXZaFb-8x5HuG1530LgKf4EESo&s=RgX8lijytEABkh9LPUt0W1meT1uBg_-V27naW-W7Ppw&e=
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.google.com_url-3Fsa-3Dt-26source-3Dweb-26rct-3Dj-26url-3Dhttps-3A__files.eric.ed.gov_fulltext_ED348600.pdf-26ved-3D2ahUKEwiPzMLk-2DtrqAhXELH0KHS5ZAs4QFjABegQIBBAB-26usg-3DAOvVaw1LOvMInu3N1o9iEJvVY8YB&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=dV8LmVFnbOlj5VxkDUn5xSaqWHr5MCLS6uIA6M5o_K4&s=vlgU37ZZpN-_qz8Vk57BXX2HdUErNlYpohaDAUae824&e=>
>>
>> Cory
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2020, 7:38 PM James Lyons-Weiler <
>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> With your permission, may I inquire on opinions and discussion of root
>>> causes of the sociological developments in societies of the current suite
>>> of what are easily - and not so easily recognized as societal
>>> dysfunctions. My intended scope is US-centric, but need not be. I'll
>>> initiate by listing a few issues. Which ones are causal? Which one are
>>> symptomatic?
>>>
>>> *Profit interesting bending Science (esp. medicine and psychiatry)
>>> *Financial perverse incentives distorting Science
>>> *Lack of meaningful ROI of research translating to effective solutions
>>> *"Left vs. Right focus" masking top-down control (cf. middle-out or
>>> bottom-up) solutions
>>>
>>> Please add to/extend as you like.
>>>
>>> We need not agree, of course, but I am keen to see perspectives and
>>> learn of voices willing to try to *name the issue* and offer a
>>> definition.
>>>
>>> It need not be an "ism", but I suspect it is on the scale of "*Imperialism,
>>> Nazism, Communism*".
>>>
>>> Lately I've been enamored with the phrase "Process Solution"; ie.,
>>> the identification of an ever-improving process that makes the
>>> identification and adoption of a viable and helpful (valuable) solution
>>> more likely - so if you have process solutions in mind and if they help
>>> w/finding a name due to the present absence of that solution, I'd be eager
>>> to learn of them.
>>>
>>> James Lyons-Weiler, PhD
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 5:56 PM Chance McDermott <[log in to unmask]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I support Gregg in this!
>>>>
>>>> =Chance
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 10:39 AM Cole Butler <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well said, Gregg.
>>>>>
>>>>> I’ve not been following this Pinker controversy (nor am I acquainted
>>>>> with his work), but your points regarding contextualization of the broader
>>>>> socio-political landscape of the US (and West, more broadly) and the
>>>>> idealogical protection of egos so as to avoid offense both speak to me.
>>>>> Within the smaller circles of my work, I’ve lately seen the science and
>>>>> greater mission of our work threatened to be crumbled under the fear of
>>>>> offending some big personalities. This is quite worrisome from my position,
>>>>> as others seem to be apt to deferring these feelings toward me. I hope
>>>>> that, within the academy and more broadly, we can work to be able to speak
>>>>> freely [even when it threatens offending others (I’m not speaking here in
>>>>> the context of race)] in the name of the ultimate ideal of helping others
>>>>> through high-quality work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Cole
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 8:28 AM Michael Mascolo <
>>>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Good, courageous work, Gregg.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> M.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Michael F. Mascolo, Ph.D.*
>>>>>> Academic Director, Compass Program
>>>>>> Professor, Department of Psychology
>>>>>> Merrimack College, North Andover, MA 01845
>>>>>> 978.837.3503 (office)
>>>>>> 978.979.8745 (cell)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Political Conversations Study: *www.CreatingCommonGround.org
>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.creatingcommonground.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=aHGv2k0oV6dpAydV2ONDDuK5xZ5sLdP71WDfMW0XbNI&s=K2PXF679Gi2-qOfSEWxrsP_JOpf0k8E6dg80DGz9IqM&e=>*
>>>>>> Blog: Values Matter
>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_values-2Dmatter&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=aHGv2k0oV6dpAydV2ONDDuK5xZ5sLdP71WDfMW0XbNI&s=yoB292j9_vxRNqpQUYPBaOqDuedD76JIVrr_rGIdgpg&e=>
>>>>>> Journal: Pedagogy and the Human Sciences
>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__scholarworks.merrimack.edu_phs_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=aHGv2k0oV6dpAydV2ONDDuK5xZ5sLdP71WDfMW0XbNI&s=pMuXe7MRO8Fbz4zNYqxauhFcWuqQ_AaAKsgiRHLpdkw&e=>
>>>>>> Coaching and Author Website: www.michaelmascolo.com
>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.michaelmascolo.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=aHGv2k0oV6dpAydV2ONDDuK5xZ5sLdP71WDfMW0XbNI&s=xAveSTJvhhxN43vKuO2aTElVIXp4b4RzpdaQOzSldjM&e=>
>>>>>> Academia Home Page: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__merrimack.academia.edu_MichaelMascolo&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=rqEHa_BdHbaKo18DygXZaFb-8x5HuG1530LgKf4EESo&s=Pcs5i_P0Xw_tTJBsZGquWShLdwXsjoCrXJ1ESj54c28&e=
>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__merrimack.academia.edu_MichaelMascolo&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=aHGv2k0oV6dpAydV2ONDDuK5xZ5sLdP71WDfMW0XbNI&s=LaEf5oyTeHm6B6f1Rf8Xx3f5cHf3mX6F0vvBXpOXARY&e=>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "*Things move, persons act.*" -- Kenneth Burke
>>>>>> "*If it's not worth doing, it's not worth doing well*." -- Donald
>>>>>> Hebb
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 19, 2020, at 8:18 AM, Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <
>>>>>> [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi TOK Folks,
>>>>>> I thought I would share this post I made this morning on the
>>>>>> metamodern forum I am on:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>> I think when discussing these issues, such as the petition against
>>>>>> Pinker, the Harper letter, and so forth, it is crucial to distinguish the
>>>>>> setting/community/cultural context folks have in mind. For example, there
>>>>>> is the United States as a whole. That might be one contextual setting. When
>>>>>> folks look at the US as a whole, then you see Donald Trump as the President
>>>>>> and you see the history of slavery and Jim Crow and the remarkable
>>>>>> inequities, and much like *@handrews*
>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.metamoderna.org_u_handrews&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=_lla770peQlgRBFfwJwSfFiONQdygXo-fy8wGS3q6Ak&s=oF_YzrY5UCQAolXMPE6cNw9JH0qdAlyWGQslIJHNo3Q&e=>
>>>>>> argues, the general complaints about word usage or political
>>>>>> positions seem small potatoes.
>>>>>> However, when we flip the context to inside the academia or leftist
>>>>>> media centers or other left-leaning ideological contexts, the issue is VERY
>>>>>> different. I can tell you, I live in the academy, in the social sciences
>>>>>> (professional psychology) and the climate here is very different. We are
>>>>>> MUCH closer to thought/language police than people seem to realize. Virtue
>>>>>> signaling is everywhere, as is an almost Orwellian use of language
>>>>>> regarding justice and morality (i.e., more often than not in such contexts,
>>>>>> IMO, those who are doing the moralizing and shaming are not operating from
>>>>>> a “higher ground”). Not only that, I believe much of it is ideologically
>>>>>> misguided. Academics bending over backwards to eliminate anything that
>>>>>> could be subjectively perceived by a person educated in postmodern critical
>>>>>> race theory as being offensive is not where real change is to be had, IMO.
>>>>>> Rather, as I saw firsthand in working on the inner city streets of
>>>>>> Philadelphia from 1999-2003, there are deep class/race/structural issues
>>>>>> that need to be tackled head on.
>>>>>> If one is situated in the academy, one should object strongly to the
>>>>>> letter against Pinker. It justifies language police, which is a problem
>>>>>> inside hyper-progressive systems and much of the academy has been (is are
>>>>>> being) captured by this troubling ideology (*see the footnote on pg
>>>>>> 122 of this article I wrote*
>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.gregghenriques.com_uploads_2_4_3_6_24368778_toward-5Fa-5Fuseful-5Fmass-5Fmovement.pdf&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=_lla770peQlgRBFfwJwSfFiONQdygXo-fy8wGS3q6Ak&s=MQ4zFryRZc6-i4sQiqrZFYHGgOzw33TjzpSB-H2qAOQ&e=>
>>>>>> back in 2005). The bottom line is that we are living in massively
>>>>>> polarized socio-ideological
>>>>>> ecologies and because context is everything there are rarely general
>>>>>> positions (i.e., Pinker letter was “bad” versus “an important signal”) that
>>>>>> are defensible without specifying the context to apply to argument. Inside
>>>>>> the context of academy, the Pinker letter is horrendous and the signatories
>>>>>> should be embarrassed for their actions. In the larger context of a society
>>>>>> that has elected Trump, it can be seen as a small issue that maybe
>>>>>> oversteps but makes an important point on principle.
>>>>>> My hope is that those who operate from a metamodern sensibility would
>>>>>> have the general capacity to see that the extreme polarization in the US
>>>>>> (which is probably infecting the West) is a function of inadequate cultural
>>>>>> codes being defined against one another in problematic ways. We need to
>>>>>> disentangle those conflicts, eliminate weak positions, and work to seek and
>>>>>> create common ground based on a clear, rich sophisticated sense-making and
>>>>>> deep value codes that can stretch across the socio-ecological levels of
>>>>>> (in)dividual, dyadic, family, small group, community, state, nation,
>>>>>> transnational and global.
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Gregg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>>>>> following link:
>>>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>>>>> following link:
>>>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cole Butler
>>>>> Research Coordinator
>>>>> Project Coordinator: Treating Parents with ADHD and their Children (
>>>>> TPAC
>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__umdadhd.org_ongoing-2Dprojects-2Dand-2Dfunding&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=m4Lgr5K9RsK2kfFuDLUucnjl9HBMfu578iixPiNlKAI&s=jEu98H0en2z0M9-YxD4ZZlk1mBP6Op5_2F8VNGhVsMU&e=>
>>>>> )
>>>>> SUCCEEDS
>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__umdadhd.org_succeeds&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=m4Lgr5K9RsK2kfFuDLUucnjl9HBMfu578iixPiNlKAI&s=IwKrVbLS1jHCZaquaR76-zEXw7Y8rQjTGKUgDnfI0YE&e=>
>>>>> Coach
>>>>> University of Maryland
>>>>> UMD ADHD Lab
>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.umdadhd.org_cole&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=m4Lgr5K9RsK2kfFuDLUucnjl9HBMfu578iixPiNlKAI&s=GOVDjBYmYJAv45tcqfKnD2d3xbBPBf4tbUB8M1XcZ2Y&e=>
>>>>> 2103W, Cole Field House | College Park, MD 20742
>>>>> tel 301.405.6163
>>>>> ############################
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>>>> following link:
>>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>>>>
>>>> ############################
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>>> following link:
>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ---
>>> james lyons-weiler, phd
>>> Author, CEO, President, Scientist
>>> Editor-in-Chief, Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=sllb8P2BxAbyIjAbR2j6asv_0446rYYjNCAo-GoLygw&s=UmdT1B8T3JWYV6QmNWxfmkXAzkd6HRGopAuQ-dQL1bc&e=>
>>> Guest Contributor, Children's Health Defense
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__childrenshealthdefense.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=sllb8P2BxAbyIjAbR2j6asv_0446rYYjNCAo-GoLygw&s=WfmYRqWO-7n-52na5e7qD3Hm7imFJlOhFwl5fjJw6FA&e=>
>>>
>>> The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1KNSxPp&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=sllb8P2BxAbyIjAbR2j6asv_0446rYYjNCAo-GoLygw&s=4tRilo4je86mvXuFSL_WPoWNo6gUc9LWUC1TUM2D9hU&e=>
>>> (Skyhorse Publishing)
>>> Cures vs. Profits: Successes in Translational Research
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.amazon.com_gp_product_9814730149_ref-3Das-5Fli-5Fqf-5Fsp-5Fasin-5Fil-5Ftl-3Fie-3DUTF8-26camp-3D1789-26creative-3D9325-26creativeASIN-3D9814730149-26linkCode-3Das2-26tag-3Dlivgrelivwel-2D20&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=sllb8P2BxAbyIjAbR2j6asv_0446rYYjNCAo-GoLygw&s=I9zcWOtsnINHx8aKDXrOPVJ_8FuSnocuWd5slkXtcko&e=> (World
>>> Scientific, 2016)
>>> Ebola: An Evolving Story
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1TGYY9r&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=sllb8P2BxAbyIjAbR2j6asv_0446rYYjNCAo-GoLygw&s=UvppKf9AhBK5ctxVpUg56l6N-EzmRTYspxbV_NnCtkA&e=>
>>> (World Scientific, 2015)
>>> cell 412-728-8743
>>> email [log in to unmask]
>>> www.*linkedin*.com/in/*jameslyonsweiler*
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jameslyonsweiler&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=sllb8P2BxAbyIjAbR2j6asv_0446rYYjNCAo-GoLygw&s=Y9BAGnW8J_6EdObtrXQfepIsSRzMB-qmftO3dmW9NUQ&e=>
>>> ############################
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>> following link:
>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>>
>> ############################
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>> following link:
>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>
>
>
> --
> ---
> james lyons-weiler, phd
> Author, CEO, President, Scientist
> Editor-in-Chief, Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=D-9ZbkJ3UKJEqsE3Xl0MZ4WVjgIoHLzqIgKsT1Zylng&s=vgW6t5Qj9bodrQ1dQ54_Tu0ftOnyF27SXP6-Zir_WAs&e=>
> Guest Contributor, Children's Health Defense
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__childrenshealthdefense.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=D-9ZbkJ3UKJEqsE3Xl0MZ4WVjgIoHLzqIgKsT1Zylng&s=IG-W0HWgt-TH7DS8foKhSn7RgjUiMGvVnLMXwo9ICt0&e=>
>
> The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1KNSxPp&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=D-9ZbkJ3UKJEqsE3Xl0MZ4WVjgIoHLzqIgKsT1Zylng&s=FPwYmAIjJjQ6jrCets2iWj1thjMF_IZANqxawbclvZA&e=>
> (Skyhorse Publishing)
> Cures vs. Profits: Successes in Translational Research
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.amazon.com_gp_product_9814730149_ref-3Das-5Fli-5Fqf-5Fsp-5Fasin-5Fil-5Ftl-3Fie-3DUTF8-26camp-3D1789-26creative-3D9325-26creativeASIN-3D9814730149-26linkCode-3Das2-26tag-3Dlivgrelivwel-2D20&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=D-9ZbkJ3UKJEqsE3Xl0MZ4WVjgIoHLzqIgKsT1Zylng&s=b-7PQy6ZLJye-X2taQPeYAUqg7juprYpqS_WP4zdKQI&e=> (World
> Scientific, 2016)
> Ebola: An Evolving Story
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1TGYY9r&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=D-9ZbkJ3UKJEqsE3Xl0MZ4WVjgIoHLzqIgKsT1Zylng&s=Qgfw9O83wc85sSjgDLobUjdJ57BxzN4JU9d3HbXuKoY&e=>
> (World Scientific, 2015)
> cell 412-728-8743
> email [log in to unmask]
> www.*linkedin*.com/in/*jameslyonsweiler*
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jameslyonsweiler&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=D-9ZbkJ3UKJEqsE3Xl0MZ4WVjgIoHLzqIgKsT1Zylng&s=McqD2Ks8Ic764R77bLnuWL3-isaaYTVPIW-nDY43UAw&e=>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
############################
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
|
