TOK-SOCIETY-L Archives

October 2020

TOK-SOCIETY-L@LISTSERV.JMU.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Lyons-Weiler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
tree of knowledge system discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 8 Oct 2020 23:45:07 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 kB) , text/html (52 kB)
Joseph,
Apologies sir my email inbox is a torrent these days.  I will seek an
engage in kind.

I have some comments to offer also on your replies below and they deserve
full attn.  Likely tomorrow.

Cheers,

Jack
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020, 10:42 PM Joseph Michalski <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi folks. I'm not sure how the TOK ended up becoming a discussion forum
> for COVID, but here we are. I responded to Jack's concerns with an effort
> to combine "science" with "wisdom," based on the information we had at our
> disposal and that we shared. No one commented or amended the ideas, but
> then I wasn't commenting on the efficacy of "lockdowns" for example. C'est
> la vie.
>
> Yet people obviously still have strong views, as per Tania's latest
> message & attachments. I understand her passion for opposing the lockdown
> & public wearing of masks, at least from a legal standpoint: "I believe
> the legal case against these lockdowns and outdoor mask mandates is rock
> solid. Now we need to work out a way to get to the court and get these
> repealed." That may or may not make sense, depending on your framing of the
> issues (justification) and in terms of your personal politics & beliefs
> about human nature, etc. Reasonable people can agree to disagree on "human
> rights" issues & contemporary legal systems & the "role of governments" in
> the contemporary world, etc. I'll let those of you inclined to debate
> politics do just that. For the TOK, I'm mainly interested in addressing
> these issues as a social scientist, as that's my bailiwick.
>
> My concern is with Tania's next statement, from a scientific justification
> standpoint: "We need to fight because the deaths of despair and mental
> health ramifications of this lockdown will far exceed the harms from the
> pandemic." It's far more complicated, but let me offer a few observations &
> call upon some research to clarify.
>
> First, there's actually a great deal of research these days available to
> examine different public health responses to pandemics in general and even
> different kinds of lockdowns in particular. I cannot possibly summarize
> this enormous body here, but here are two important "general" findings:
> lockdowns have far less negative effects if there's widespread buy-in & a
> "we're in this together" mentality (e.g., Britain during WW II facing the
> rocket attacks), but more negative effects if there's widespread
> disagreement & weak solidarity. But the most rigorous research demonstrates
> that the impact of lockdowns (and pandemic responses in general) is FAR
> more powerfully explained by looking at a range of population risk factors
> - especially wealth and inequality, not to mention age factors, measures of
> social integration & isolation, availability of health services, and other
> factors. In short, some groups - just like contracting and/or dying from
> COVID - are at much greater risk than others for adverse mental health
> consequences. And some factors (like wealth) are robust predictors of the
> impacts, at least within regional contexts, as well as one's position
> within broader social matrices. In short, we know pretty darn well the
> normal distribution of responses & effects - and who lies at either tail
> end of the distributions. And we can do an excellent job of modeling such
> risk. The public policy problem has always been, of course, that there
> typically are NOT "one-size-fits-all" solutions b/c of the complexity of
> interactional contexts, the population heterogeneity w/ respect to living &
> risk conditions, and so forth.
>
> Second, we also have a lot of excellent soc psych research that has shown
> for decades that "perceived" injustices or inequities can have serious
> negative impacts. For example, the reason Trump's leaving the hospital to
> take a drive around certainly can be seen as problematic by those concerned
> about the secret service agents, etc. But the real damage? While his
> backers may "love" seeing a "strong president," etc., the real damage is
> the messaging: "sure, if you're wealthy, you can go wherever you want, get
> the best care, & do whatever you want" (the Cummings effect in Britain
> parallels this Trump incident), and, moreover, your "health" and the power
> that you have trump the concerns of the general population or the "average
> person". The research shows this sort of thing to be extremely negatively
> received, and Gregg & the psychologists can explain all of this much better
> than I as a non-psychologist.
>
> Third, let's be clear about COVID-19:  the mental health effects overall *have
> definitely been negative in the aggregate*, with some populations &
> subgroups doing much worse than others in looking at population-research
> and comparative evidence. There ARE real risks involved - and any
> responsible scientist, mental health professional, or simply concerned
> family members can understand this to be the case. Just like people are
> concerned about the real & yet differential effects of catching COVID. But,
> again, we have to be more scientific. I've attached some of the research
> from the best medical & public health journals in the world, for your
> consideration. Even here, though, we have some mixed findings and no
> consensus re: impacts or anything approaching what we now believe about,
> say, "smoking and lung cancer," or "seatbelts and motor accident
> fatalities." Mental health impacts are real, and yet differentially
> distributed - both within AND across countries.
>
> Fourth, I've attached an article of models examining the impact of the
> spread of COVID following lockdowns across 149 countries. These results are
> somewhat encouraging. But, again, it's not a permanent solution, but the
> evidence points to the relative efficacy "early" lockdowns especially. Yet,
> we have to be realistic: who truly believes that sheltering in place or
> lockdowns that extend for MANY months will not have negative effects on
> mental health? You might even expect people to do stuff like what happened
> in Michigan.
>
> Fifth, we have additional health risks too under conditions of prolonged
> shutdowns, such as the incidence of still births or myocardial infarctions.
> I've attached one article on the former issue in India. Again, as w/ mental
> health issues, the population health literature in general shows that these
> risks too are unevenly distributed, but I will not beat that drum further.
>
> Sixth, most people can agree that there are negative econ impacts too, as
> we have all seen. And that cannot continue indefinitely either, in terms of
> everything from disruptions of supply chains to unemployment & the other
> recession/depression mechanisms. Again, this isn't "automatic" - and
> governments can do lots of things to help support their populations & those
> out of work thru econ supports, as well as ways of assisting whole
> industries. That said, it's accepted that you cannot lockdown indefinitely.
> Here we can learn a lot of lessons from different strategies & different
> country responses in terms of staged moves away from lockdowns, and how
> effective a "safe return" to work/school/etc. can be, if done properly. So,
> to Tania's main concerns, there are certainly good reasons to be concerned
> & nearly everyone would like to move away from lockdowns & economic
> disruption as soon as possible. It's in the "how" and "under what
> conditions" that the devilish details lie.
>
> Seventh, there are other impacts from COVID that, in principle, have
> yielded net positive effects - and none moreso than the effects on the
> natural environment that have been quite immediate in many areas in terms
> of air/water quality for example, as well as more robust responses by other
> animal populations. I've attached one article evaluating the positive
> impact of COVID lockdowns on air quality which has led to significant
> reductions in "premature mortality from cardiovascular and respiratory
> diseases." Do all those lives saved balance out in any way the lives lost
> (e.g., suicides, serious mental health issues) as a result at least partly
> due to the lockdowns? Again, whatever one's politics or one's list of
> priorities, it's important to acknowledge that we obviously impact the
> natural envt with our actions & lifestyles - and we may want to look a bit
> more thoughtfully & recalibrate some of what we're doing accordingly. But
> that's not my point, i.e., to tell anyone "what to do" with knowledge about
> the envt or even the COVID data in general that I'm sharing. I just want
> people to think more deeply about these issues, both from a scientific
> complexity standpoint and from a TOK perspective. Then we can see what we
> learn and where we land moving forward in terms of our shared knowledge.
> Indeed, I'm thinking of doing a paper on COVID from a TOK perspective, if
> anyone's interested in collaborating.
>
> Best regards, -Joe
>
>
> Dr. Joseph H. Michalski
>
> Professor
>
> King’s University College at Western University
>
> 266 Epworth Avenue, DL-201
>
> London, Ontario, Canada  N6A 2M3
>
> Tel: (519) 433-3491
>
> Email: [log in to unmask]
>
> ______________________
>
>
> Dr. Joseph H. Michalski
>
> Professor
>
> King’s University College at Western University
>
> 266 Epworth Avenue, DL-201
>
> London, Ontario, Canada  N6A 2M3
>
> Tel: (519) 433-3491
>
> Email: [log in to unmask]
>
> ______________________
>
> *ei*π + 1 = 0
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* tree of knowledge system discussion <
> [log in to unmask]> on behalf of Tania de Jong <
> [log in to unmask]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 8, 2020 7:22 PM
> *To:* [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> *Subject:* Re: TOK: Collapse of Trust in American Institutions
>
>
> HI there Gregg and everyone.
>
> You may find the attached of interest. It’s from a senior public servant
> who resigned with a public statement on his disagreement with the way the
> pandemic was being managed in Victoria.
>
>
>
> I've now converted the paper that I presented last evening into Word and
> PDF. Both these versions can be downloaded from:
>
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.sabhlokcity.com_2020_10_my-2Dpaper-2Dfor-2Dtodays-2Dtalk-2Dat-2Dthe-2Dsamuel-2Dgriffith-2Dsociety-2Dthe-2Dproportionality-2Dof-2Dthe-2Dvictorian-2Dgovernments-2Dresponse-2Dto-2Dcovid-2D19_&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=srSsLSh3CbxJmkTNLoBMraWwAZBCUgOLZn7SmO5FNlk&s=hJkFZoFEjsmAVW-w0XJuxx6ay21YgJJ_86ueeUqE0Wg&e= 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.sabhlokcity.com_2020_10_my-2Dpaper-2Dfor-2Dtodays-2Dtalk-2Dat-2Dthe-2Dsamuel-2Dgriffith-2Dsociety-2Dthe-2Dproportionality-2Dof-2Dthe-2Dvictorian-2Dgovernments-2Dresponse-2Dto-2Dcovid-2D19_&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=rVVGDzgMB2ceuu00Tqix51SB_6MDsHJVxOrLtDywkYE&s=cJbeTOxsW0lPDtex54shqQ3kj_ii7lQryw4SOyS5SkY&e=>
>
>
>
> I'm also attaching the PDF for convenience. Do circulate this paper to
> everyone you can. I believe it sketches out most key issues that the people
> of Victoria should start thinking about.
>
>  I believe the legal case against these lockdowns and outdoor mask
> mandates is rock solid. Now we need to work out a way to get to the court
> and get these repealed.
>
>
>
> We need to fight because the deaths of despair and mental health
> ramifications of this lockdown will far exceed the harms from the pandemic.
>
>
>
> Please also see attached my new Opinion Piece to be published in the next
> few days in a Victorian mainstream paper.
>
> All best Tania
>
>
>
> *From:* tree of knowledge system discussion <
> [log in to unmask]> *On Behalf Of *James Lyons-Weiler
> *Sent:* Friday, 9 October 2020 3:45 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: TOK: Collapse of Trust in American Institutions
>
>
>
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
>
> Thank you Gregg.
>
>
>
> If there is a new initiative and a letter to be written in must transcend
> political boundaries - a tall order in these times.
>
>
>
> It should deal with the net cost of the lockdowns in terms of deaths of
> despair and relapses and relapses into addiction.
>
>
>
> And it would address this new event today... And help people think about
> what this means.
>
>
>
> Feds say they've thwarted alleged plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen
> Whitmer and overthrow state government
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.newsbreakapp.com_n_0XFEu7mZ-3Fs-3Da99-26pd-3D04mLSpAa&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=srSsLSh3CbxJmkTNLoBMraWwAZBCUgOLZn7SmO5FNlk&s=hA3-0VleJepk5FbGYIaA4X8Q8HWwRzK6OgT-E-Wm6eI&e= 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.newsbreakapp.com_n_0XFEu7mZ-3Fs-3Da99-26pd-3D04mLSpAa&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=yfjb0KCAAAnZAVgXJPPArK7bCRJw2VXaLAa3dqaIVhY&s=I9rL5e3GMKEAnH34hJ6ZrxwpcpDXa9d-0nyOFocBHlo&e=>
>
>
>
> While I do not support  their means to their ends, these individuals
> clearly cherish the core principles upon which United States was founded.
> The politicization of Public Health responses and the imposition of
> for-profit agendas as the solution set of those responses have created an
> incubator for such serious levels of discontent.
>
>
>
> I would certainly encourage the letter to also include a call for the use
> of AI as an aid for policymakers and the public to be able to give full due
> consideration to all of the variables in terms of net human pain and
> suffering in real terms.
>
>
>
> Jack
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020, 11:43 AM Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Jack.
>
>
>
> I will consider this. In the meantime, you might want to check out the
> website, Creating Common Ground
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.creatingcommonground.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=yfjb0KCAAAnZAVgXJPPArK7bCRJw2VXaLAa3dqaIVhY&s=BA_NOJRrC8usm_2wT52evCPv5s0htdObB0ZhTebKfKY&e=>
> that Mike Mascolo spearheaded and that I contributed to. You will see a
> letter/essay there on our divided America that offers a possible frame.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Gregg
>
>
>
> *From:* tree of knowledge system discussion <
> [log in to unmask]> *On Behalf Of *James Lyons-Weiler
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 8, 2020 11:10 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: TOK: Collapse of Trust in American Institutions
>
>
>
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
>
> Gregg, thank you for the article.  It is stuck in the maelstrom.
>
>
>
> IMV, the article got it right about CDC's faulty tests, but it's a
> scratch, not a dent.  According to insiders, it's unthinkably bad at CDC
> given its reputation,
>
> and it has been this way for decades. (E.g., this from 2017 from SPIDER
> among the ranks -
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.huffpost.com_entry_spider-2Dbites-2Dcdc-2Dethics-2Dc-5Fb-5F12525012&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=srSsLSh3CbxJmkTNLoBMraWwAZBCUgOLZn7SmO5FNlk&s=wl7jkM-XjYCV7XsNte0Y0ZRBt4JyF7YizHX570fl9PE&e= 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.huffpost.com_entry_spider-2Dbites-2Dcdc-2Dethics-2Dc-5Fb-5F12525012&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=Sfr6NN_hdWzivMWxr3o8FJ75sXhUybQzaZTtbU6szkw&s=g7nxH22Hra_ZYFRT02NmgHfVLRnFYaWy8udL0GzSMKs&e=>
> )
>
>
>
> The article also makes other sweeping characterizations about social
> groups that further polarize, and worst of all it confuses the symptom of
> widespread distrust with the root  causes... (Imagine a dysfunctional
> couple "*Our relationship is bad because you distrust me*".  I don't
> think they will get far toward healing down that superficial path).
>
>
>
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.theatlantic.com_ideas_archive_2020_10_collapsing-2Dlevels-2Dtrust-2Dare-2Ddevastating-2Damerica_616581_&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=srSsLSh3CbxJmkTNLoBMraWwAZBCUgOLZn7SmO5FNlk&s=BNC4bZhAnzbtSbeUleU01CLetJtTvzIVxZR1-FQpcYw&e= 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.theatlantic.com_ideas_archive_2020_10_collapsing-2Dlevels-2Dtrust-2Dare-2Ddevastating-2Damerica_616581_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=Sfr6NN_hdWzivMWxr3o8FJ75sXhUybQzaZTtbU6szkw&s=22jOjuY6_wy9AbGjTKm4hhs0HtaU095fqwk4ZWFMC3c&e=>
>
>
>
> To Eric's point, to create positive, creative healing momentum in the US,
> the problem must be seen as a collection of dysfunctional and alienated
> relationships, and addressed accordingly.
>
>
>
> A statement from professionals like those in this group on the collective
> zeitgeist (which many people refer to as the shitstorm) which steps outside
> and counsels America as a family with all of the dysfunctions on dead-ends
> and destructive pathways would be brilliant.
>
>
>
> There is a trend these weeks in which scientists and MDs around the world
> are publishing open letters.
>
>
>
> May I humbly plead with you all on behalf of this *immature* and hurting
> public and invite you all to consider the same, "An Open Letter to America
> from Psychologists".
>
>
>
> I will be happy to help edit and publish same with an eye for pointing out
> polarizing phrases.
>
>
>
> (The letter would open for psychologists beyond ToK to consider, read and
> sign if they concur)
>
>
>
> James Lyons-Weiler
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 2:51 AM easalien <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
>
> Hey Gregg,
>
>
>
> Always appreciated David Brooks’ humanity. The article distills the
> cultural breakdown we’re experiencing, but it doesn’t provide solutions. It
> seems we’re arguing in circles, even—to some degree—on this forum.
>
>
>
> Until we see these problems as bigger than ourselves, we won’t have the
> humility to solve them. We are dealing with something fundamental: entropy.
>
>
>
> This is going to take all of us.
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Eric S.
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 6, 2020, Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
>   I thought this David Brooks article on the collapse of trust was worth
> reading:
>
> *https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.theatlantic.com_ideas_archive_2020_10_collapsing-2Dlevels-2Dtrust-2Dare-2Ddevastating-2Damerica_616581_&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=srSsLSh3CbxJmkTNLoBMraWwAZBCUgOLZn7SmO5FNlk&s=BNC4bZhAnzbtSbeUleU01CLetJtTvzIVxZR1-FQpcYw&e= 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.theatlantic.com_ideas_archive_2020_10_collapsing-2Dlevels-2Dtrust-2Dare-2Ddevastating-2Damerica_616581_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=HA5DeogY3N8d1o6a0wLzqMsQpNdL1uPl4bBEGt-5M-A&s=NXdmDOzbG_NTPKQE7JjTqpWJD7DRHGSRqvUKXRYhqsg&e=>*
>
>
>
> This is the Blue Church wavering as people realize that its structure and
> inertia is not capable of doing what needs to be done to address the issues
> that we are confronting. It is why we need folks who can see what is
> happening and have a better operating system to foster a transition into a
> new world order, one bridges what was good from the old into what is needed
> for the future.
>
>
> Best,
>
> G
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________
>
> Gregg Henriques, Ph.D.
> Professor
> Department of Graduate Psychology
> 216 Johnston Hall
> MSC 7401
> James Madison University
> Harrisonburg, VA 22807
> (540) 568-7857 (phone)
> (540) 568-4747 (fax)
>
>
> *Be that which enhances dignity and well-being with integrity.*
>
> Check out the Unified Theory Of Knowledge homepage at:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.unifiedtheoryofknowledge.org_&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=srSsLSh3CbxJmkTNLoBMraWwAZBCUgOLZn7SmO5FNlk&s=RtNyHSgbsrh-Xh56ZcYtRWpRzZ7M6KowNa2h9uuTayM&e= 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.unifiedtheoryofknowledge.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=HA5DeogY3N8d1o6a0wLzqMsQpNdL1uPl4bBEGt-5M-A&s=f6CL3IvaoYDWgwODkW5ypN2Du4M9ooBja7bGiqJRzcw&e=>
>
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ---
> james lyons-weiler, phd
>
> Author, CEO, President, Scientist
>
> Editor-in-Chief, Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=Sfr6NN_hdWzivMWxr3o8FJ75sXhUybQzaZTtbU6szkw&s=g4bYqRDy6JpNXyR-MeQiNOpYi6Zkp1unffBlyNrVAbA&e=>
>
> Guest Contributor, Children's Health Defense
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__childrenshealthdefense.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=Sfr6NN_hdWzivMWxr3o8FJ75sXhUybQzaZTtbU6szkw&s=ueo0AiltATj9dSLV6ki7C0BGrfolCgcWi8QxSxNPA18&e=>
>
>
>
> The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1KNSxPp&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=Sfr6NN_hdWzivMWxr3o8FJ75sXhUybQzaZTtbU6szkw&s=yWhBLGN54lErKpX6EpS7GDPTCn_gJ69NeHCnQtPMcbU&e=>
> (Skyhorse Publishing)
>
> Cures vs. Profits: Successes in Translational Research
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.amazon.com_gp_product_9814730149_ref-3Das-5Fli-5Fqf-5Fsp-5Fasin-5Fil-5Ftl-3Fie-3DUTF8-26camp-3D1789-26creative-3D9325-26creativeASIN-3D9814730149-26linkCode-3Das2-26tag-3Dlivgrelivwel-2D20&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=Sfr6NN_hdWzivMWxr3o8FJ75sXhUybQzaZTtbU6szkw&s=n2DfLPm4eBZ_Ai0UVAHaL6hV9qEuYED58m60twbYmUk&e=> (World
> Scientific, 2016)
>
> Ebola: An Evolving Story
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1TGYY9r&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=Sfr6NN_hdWzivMWxr3o8FJ75sXhUybQzaZTtbU6szkw&s=t6TOgtQxsRnQjN9mJ2sfQ6ov0hJmrC2l0CiwmybXlx8&e=>
> (World Scientific, 2015)
>
> cell 412-728-8743
> email [log in to unmask]
> www.*linkedin*.com/in/*jameslyonsweiler*
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jameslyonsweiler&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=Sfr6NN_hdWzivMWxr3o8FJ75sXhUybQzaZTtbU6szkw&s=ZfpsGlifoMtPZy_K63f_DVH6zHQE6FFYyZeoR1lW3LI&e=>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2