TOK-SOCIETY-L Archives

May 2019

TOK-SOCIETY-L@LISTSERV.JMU.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Lloyd Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
tree of knowledge system discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 May 2019 21:37:37 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (5 kB) , text/html (10 kB)

Hello Alexander, et. al.,
I agree that the term "free will" is clumsy, as John Locke suggested in the 17th century. 
Philosophy, not being a science, allows such inaccuracies of terms, despite the unnecessary misunderstanding it causes.
I think that those two words together have come to mean something other than what each might mean in other contexts; free will is the act of an agent authoring a choice autonomously. So also, it’s not so much a matter of something to have, but rather a matter of doing. 

I agree, as you stated, that just “choice” alone is a better term, as there is no real choosing if one is determined or coerced; freedom of choice is redundant.

Regards,
Peter


Peter Lloyd Jones
[log in to unmask]
562-209-4080

Sent by determined causes that no amount of will is able to thwart. 



> On May 17, 2019, at 4:56 PM, Alexander Bard <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Dear Gregg & Co
> 
> But why even discuss free will when this concerns freedom of choice.
> Or rather just choice per se.
> A will wills whatever it wills. It is neither free nor determined. The combo of will and freedom seems merely a remnant of Abrahamic religion and its eagerness to hold believers accountable for their intentions.
> As in good will versus evil will. But there is no such thing. A will is beyond good and evil. It wills whatever it wills.
> We should discuss a will's freedom to choose. Not its own freedom. There is apparently no such thing. A will will always try to get whatever it wants. At all times. The question is if it has that choice or not.
> 
> Best
> Alexander
> 
> Den fre 17 maj 2019 kl 22:03 skrev Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>:
> Hi TOK List,
> 
>   Thought you might be interested in seeing this article on Free Will. Minus a few technical points, this is consistent with a ToK version of reality:
> 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__nautil.us_issue_72_quandary_yes-2Ddeterminists-2Dthere-2Dis-2Dfree-2Dwill&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=e24HUO_sncpikXBb4acCMeOlLnEeQOqeY5i9uaI2B1w&s=r-tYaHTBZj-Q0KpoeVxfFwpR2e6R_XIgXYRiJzi_GMw&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__nautil.us_issue_72_quandary_yes-2Ddeterminists-2Dthere-2Dis-2Dfree-2Dwill&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=G1XkHpKhGuXrWRmIGwwGi7rOIn2dxfTPssg91x8Zz_Y&s=wXqMgwevkPxlORiKI1vvCF9DERz8JipCn1NW4csh7t4&e=>
>  
> 
>   The key is that there are different dimensions of existence (Matter, Life, Mind, and Culture) and different causal processes that operate at those different dimensions. Human persons are self-conscious entities that learn to justify and take responsibility for their actions on the social stage. This is a causal matrix, obvious at the present moment, as I am justifying to you that reading the article is worth the time. As a self-reflective entity, you will decide accordingly.
> 
>  
> 
>   As the article notes, atoms do not operate (i.e., are not the appropriate causal nexus) at this dimension of complexity.
> 
> 
> Best,
> Gregg  
> 
>  
> 
> ___________________________________________
> 
> Gregg Henriques, Ph.D.
> Professor
> Department of Graduate Psychology
> 216 Johnston Hall
> MSC 7401
> James Madison University
> Harrisonburg, VA 22807
> (540) 568-7857 (phone)
> (540) 568-4747 (fax)
> 
> 
> Be that which enhances dignity and well-being with integrity.
> 
> Check out my Theory of Knowledge blog at Psychology Today at:
> 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_blog_theory-2Dknowledge&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=e24HUO_sncpikXBb4acCMeOlLnEeQOqeY5i9uaI2B1w&s=Wijuo2Kh9O3gDE9VP4bMoH5R0bDyGI5QT2Zyu_T4rrQ&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_blog_theory-2Dknowledge&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=G1XkHpKhGuXrWRmIGwwGi7rOIn2dxfTPssg91x8Zz_Y&s=IiFJ96LfMspNssFjxCh-oJtM15aW4dOuwUJt-ox5v8M&e=>
>  
> 
> Check out my webpage at:
> 
> www.gregghenriques.com <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.gregghenriques.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=G1XkHpKhGuXrWRmIGwwGi7rOIn2dxfTPssg91x8Zz_Y&s=ffVYXCdGDsdZL0AAfo1vLCZ2HLvFF5jeJ2lU6syhlWg&e=>
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> ############################
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1>############################
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1>

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2