John/Gregg:
This is *classic* . . . !!
John is PRINT and Gregg is ELECTRIC. Two different "sensibilities."
How could they possibly "agree" on anything . . . ??
The irony, of course, is that this is only happening because they are
*both* now obsolete. Both distantly in the "rear-view mirror." Both
looking backwards.
From an ELECTRIC standpoint, we all have different "language
systems." From a PRINT standpoint, we can actually try to sort all
this out -- "scientifically."
In both cases, the underlying "biases" are masked. Neither
standpoints recognizes that fundamentally different
psycho-technological environments are at work. And neither will those
who participate in the "Canonizer" game.
Crucially, neither wants to admit that DIGITAL brings a completely
different sensibility to the "debate."
Yes, this is classic . . . <g>
Mark
P.S. The irony is that a "Canon" isn't either PRINT or ELECTRIC. And
it cannot be decided by a "vote." It is SCRIBAL -- as in "Canon Law."
What a world of surprises awaits us all.
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikipedia.org_wiki_Canon-5Flaw&d=DwIBaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=liZu1PIudVuCGmjsE9GbqAYr0y2OqjrUURySMh9-XlQ&s=6LaimFVFrpAJE-fcNiRoxup3P4z-C3rLwB9vJpzG8jg&e=
############################
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1