FEAST-L Archives

November 2016

FEAST-L@LISTSERV.JMU.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Shari Stone-Mediatore <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Shari Stone-Mediatore <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 27 Nov 2016 22:25:45 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1248 bytes) , text/html (1908 bytes) , Bias in SETS excerpt.docx (29 kB)
Earlier this fall, I wrote a memo for my university on bias in student
evaluation of teaching. (I've attached an excerpt from that memo, in case
it's of interest to anyone.)

I am now seeking examples of* good practices* for student evaluation of
teaching. Has anyone's university explored better ways to have students
evaluate teaching? Has anyone's university specifically explored ways to
approach the evaluation process that could help to minimize some of the
biases? I'm interested in any "best practices" (or "better practices") that
you might be aware of.  I'd be happy to collate these "good practices" and
send them to the list.  (I did write a basic guideline earlier this fall,
which I shared with the FEAST listserv, on better and worse ways of
phrasing the questions on the evaluation forms; but I'm now seeking more
general ideas about how to approach the practice of having students
evaluate teaching.)

Thanks!
Shari

-- 
Shari Stone-Mediatore
Professor of Philosophy
Ohio Wesleyan University
Delaware, OH  43015
United States
740-368-3795
[log in to unmask]

############################

To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2