Hi Gergg,
That looks nice. I’m obviously kind of biased, but it seems to me you are
glossing over the qualitative nature of reality, like redness and
greenness. It seems to me everyone needs to understand that the qualities
we think are qualities of stuff “out there” are really qualities of stuff
in our brain. We have no ability to perceive qualities of anything ‘out
there”. For example Donald Hofman really understands this very important
stuff, as you can see in this wired article
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.wired.co.uk_article_the-2Dreality-2Dof-2Dsurvival&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=OjN5xOiTickcRLf-6DkJ56wcoEKyrYt1wkGyZVFMias&s=PqCFeHwcFLerbCAm8Nn5y7EmBna03vmBH-9G0PPV89s&e=>.
Anyway, my very biased 2 cents worth.
Brent
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 9:14 AM Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Lists,
>
> I am working on a blog or general document that attempts to explain how
> the ToK System provides a new way to understand both ourselves in the world
> and provides a scientific account of the world and our place in it. I don’t
> think there is a [synthetic natural scientific humanistic] philosophy that
> really does this in a successful way. Some, like Ken Wilber’s Integral
> Theory get close. But I think the ToK does this better than any other
> system. And that is one of the reasons it is valuable. It offers a much
> greater picture of consilience between humanistic and scientific modes of
> thought. Attached is a draft. I welcome thoughts if you have them.
>
>
> Best,
> Gregg
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
############################
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
