TOK-SOCIETY-L Archives

April 2021

TOK-SOCIETY-L@LISTSERV.JMU.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
tree of knowledge system discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:19:44 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 kB) , text/html (19 kB)
Cool, thanks!

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021, 1:11 PM michael kazanjian <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Jamie:
>
> My book, Unified Philosophy: Interdisciplinary Metaphysics, Ethics, and
> Liberal Artsk 3rd edition, is not specifically on cultural evolution.
> However, the second part of the first and remaining chapters deals with
> evolution (change) alone, stabily oriented or directed evolution, dualism,
> and stability alone.
>
> I go into Aristotle, Hegel, Teilhard, Whitehead, evaluation/process
> thought, etc.
>
> Michael
>
> On Friday, April 30, 2021, 3:03:15 PM CDT, Jamie D <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
> Thanks, I'm seel8ng to collect all major books on cultural evolution, so
> any suggestions would be appreciated.
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021, 1:25 PM James Tyler Carpenter <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
> you may want to check out pre-verbal research as well:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amazon.com_Landscape-2DMind-2DEvolution-2DArchaeology-2DThought-2Debook_dp_B005VSIYJA_ref-3Dmp-5Fs-5Fa-5F1-5F2-3Fdchild-3D1-26keywords-3DJohn-2BF.-2BHoffecker-2BLandscape-2Bof-2Bthe-2Bmind-26qid-3D1619727827-26sr-3D8-2D2&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EugzTFhUb4GKH8mlHd7Eg1BI7Clr3gDdCt_9KqS9CiE&s=fHn3G0Wkp285XrcAADDck1tSPca53cZJ8F2Th_KJ678&e= 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amazon.com_Landscape-2DMind-2DEvolution-2DArchaeology-2DThought-2Debook_dp_B005VSIYJA_ref-3Dmp-5Fs-5Fa-5F1-5F2-3Fdchild-3D1-26keywords-3DJohn-2BF.-2BHoffecker-2BLandscape-2Bof-2Bthe-2Bmind-26qid-3D1619727827-26sr-3D8-2D2&d=DwMFAg&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=dEUCV2SBV14YMf5OAkcIU2GtdueIGZ5pH_wkxab0BcI&s=tCdBf5JMo6O2pmY6g-XsB2jEukB6spQf1tWRo-M7JF8&e=>
>
>
> James Tyler Carpenter, PhD, FAACP
> www.metispsych.com
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.metispsych.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=GbFM0niG6O1a0c4w904XDezCIlevdF8ikXbqfltp3QM&s=kwscfdoXASu2qEoxSoBfvyLxJC0YZ_zChS5xZbjsUSY&e=>
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.experts.com_Expert-2DWitnesses_search-3Fkeyword-3DClinical-2520psychology-26keywordsearchtype-3DAll-2520Words-26category-3DClinical-2520forensic-2520-26categorysearchtype-3DAny-2520Word-26name-3DJames-2520tyler-2520carpenter-26namesearchtype-3DAll-2520Words-26company-3DMetis-26companysearchtype-3DAll-2520Words-26address-3D-2520-26addresssearchtype-3DAll-2520Words-26state-3DMA-26statesearchtype-3DAny-2520Word-26country-3DALL-2520-28or-2520Choose-2520a-2520Country-29-26countrysearchtype-3DAll-2520Words-26page-3D1-26freshsearch-3D1&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EugzTFhUb4GKH8mlHd7Eg1BI7Clr3gDdCt_9KqS9CiE&s=aexiKb8GGvs3wDaWtLKDOe28PW0hTMrRHF0be5A6mzk&e= 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.experts.com_Expert-2DWitnesses_search-3Fkeyword-3DClinical-2520psychology-26keywordsearchtype-3DAll-2520Words-26category-3DClinical-2520forensic-2520-26categorysearchtype-3DAny-2520Word-26name-3DJames-2520tyler-2520carpenter-26namesearchtype-3DAll-2520Words-26company-3DMetis-26companysearchtype-3DAll-2520Words-26address-3D-2520-26addresssearchtype-3DAll-2520Words-26state-3DMA-26statesearchtype-3DAny-2520Word-26country-3DALL-2520-28or-2520Choose-2520a-2520Country-29-26countrysearchtype-3DAll-2520Words-26page-3D1-26freshsearch-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=GbFM0niG6O1a0c4w904XDezCIlevdF8ikXbqfltp3QM&s=OoK2e7pPkRtko5dWtlJr5ueSupjjMJDaiXQ60hppnAs&e=>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* tree of knowledge system discussion <
> [log in to unmask]> on behalf of Jamie D <[log in to unmask]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 29, 2021 4:15:03 PM
> *To:* [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> *Subject:* Neanderthals, and evolution of language
>
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
> I'd like to share some observations that I think should be more salient to
> those working to put together the big picture TOK.
>
> *Short version:*
> 1. Upright posture
> 2. tool use
> 3.... then *with* language, Interdependence, intersubjectivity, we get
> the explosion of cumulative culture.
> 4, Around 100,000 years ago, via mutation of the voice box, modern humans
> expand speech, thus thought, thus further accelerate cumulative culture,
> giving us the edge to wipe out Neanderthals and other competition.
> 5. The capacity for complex communication allows for enough of a stable
> equilibrium within our own species that cooperation just barely out
> competes the incentives of ego domination.
>
> *Long version: *
>
> Standing upright preceded both tool use and language, evident by
> Australopithecus.
>
> Tool use preceded language, evident in some species today.
>
> The sole feature that makes humans unique, giving us our edge, is not
> hands, tools, language, nor sheer intelligence,(which I argue isn't even a
> real thing) but *cumulative cultural evolution - the integrated,
> innovative crowd.*
>
> As Joseph Heinrich points out, ants are the only other creature with
> similar amounts of biomass on the planet, and for similar reasons, but they
> don't evolve culturally.
>
> Other species have *some* culture, but not cultural *evolution*. Their
> culture has no capacity to evolve and accumulate complex arrangements of
> concepts that can integrate and find new uses.
>
> I'm very curious to really understand from a first principles, systemic
> view, how the 4th joint point emerged, because such a thorough
> understanding would be applicable to almost anything we appreciate.
>
> Now, about Neanderthals:
>
> I just saw this video at random,
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_c9KnOjsc0g4&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EugzTFhUb4GKH8mlHd7Eg1BI7Clr3gDdCt_9KqS9CiE&s=B3nt9CaDAS3GRfxbwj6a71KH_CLCzWKz7pMXU9OLuXM&e= 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Furldefense.proofpoint.com-252Fv2-252Furl-253Fu-253Dhttps-2D3A-5F-5Fyoutu.be-5Fc9KnOjsc0g4-2526d-253DDwMFaQ-2526c-253DeLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn-5F5nBEmmeq0-2526r-253DHPo1IXYDhKClogP-2DUOpybo6Cfxxz-2DjIYBgjO2gOz4-2DA-2526m-253D002Nfh5nLSYdGczUnIADJfhguaySXAohIVohXvZG7T4-2526s-253DCNjdYu86w4R-2D1mSx-2DLfjYb-2DEhACq0QRKnOLzPoiiB-5Fw-2526e-253D-26data-3D04-257C01-257C-257Ca6495a4aa1eb4ce3b34c08d90b4b842f-257C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa-257C1-257C0-257C637553241229512968-257CUnknown-257CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0-253D-257C1000-26sdata-3DkxzEHKh2rYBlmVlF7hYqPmei0xqZ0AmKOUDFvqFRwr0-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMFAg&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=dEUCV2SBV14YMf5OAkcIU2GtdueIGZ5pH_wkxab0BcI&s=KMRwTWR8IOJdXRgYuNdXXIzSLHUwtn3YvSxNIZF5hQI&e=>
>
> ...which describes how modern humans, unlike any other mammal, have a
> voice box that lowers into the throat as we grow past infancy.
>
> Neanderthals, modern apes, and human babies all have a flat base of the
> skull, and can breath and swallow nearly at the same time, but as humans
> grow past their first year, our airway and foodway get crossed as our
> larynx lowers into the throat.
>
> It makes sense that it would have taken quite a while for such a dangerous
> adaptation to secure itself, but once it did, our capacity for cultural
> evolution exploded.
>
> Neanderthals certainly had some language and cultural evolution, as they
> were human, and so even did Australopithecus... But full blown linguistic
> sophistication apparently didn't emerge until modern humans, 100,000 years
> ago, which allowed us to essentially wipe out all the competition, and then
> find an evolutionary equilibrium with groups of our own species that could
> also speak (and thus think and reason) with equal sophistication.
>
> These observations pave the way for far greater resolution of the big
> picture:
>
> 1. upright apes could face each other, and while managing heat more
> effectively and long distance cooperative running and hunting, created the
> space *and* demand for greater intersubjectivity. We looked each other in
> the face with our torso and hands exposed. Our eyes grew white sclera to
> show others where we looked.
> (Genes for cooperation vs sociopathy have been in a race ever since, with
> modern culture creating space for both.)
> Imagine upright chimpanzees barking at each other, carrying stone blades,
> working together to bring down a wounded buffalo, mostly reading each
> other's minds as they grew up together, using vocalization for long-distant
> and emotional communication. Also the hands being free and arms stretched
> out before the visual field is a ripe situation to discover the utility of
> representations.
>
> 2. As our discovery of representational utility expands, tool use expands,
> and *demand* for culture begins to accumulate, altering the fitness
> landscape that acts upon our genome. As culture gets a hold of increasing
> utility, it becomes an invisible, Godlike force that grooms and gardens our
> genes, selecting for genes favorable to cultural evolution, like Neoteny,
> communication, and a deeper, more abstract "user interface" (a throwback to
> Donald Hoffman)...which sort of IS culture - a virtual part of our genetic
> fitness landscape, beginning a long journey of blurring the lines between
> subjectivity and objectivity, changing us inside and outside. This
> generates a number of trends that have remained constant:
>    1. Neoteny
>    2. White sclera, empathy, mind reading
>    3. Demands of innovation
>    4. widening cultural complexity and integration, escalator of reason,
> expanding circle of compassion, etc...
>    5. Sharing, Commodification,
>    6. Interdependence, such that individual fitness depends almost
> entirely on contributing to the group.
>    7. *Stratification of Status Hierarchies, *such that we become more
> sensitive to fitting in,  fearful of what others might think, ....not to
> mention denial and contempt of this very quality. To this day I argue we've
> not reconciled ourselves to our own nature in this regard.
>
> 4. Homiids radiate throughout the world, but modern humans spring up with
> greater capacity for cumulative culture and wipe out all competition,
> finding stability within our own species.
>
> Lastly,
> I'm interested in the future of groups, tribalism and such, as these are
> so strongly built in that we often create distinct groups just for the
> sport of competition, which does drive evolution via sport.
>
> Future subcultures that expand their capacity to cooperate and innovate
> *together* will almost certainly make groups that don't face a threat of
> becoming obsolete in the future.
> However, the degree we are integrating and connecting should pull everyone
> together, utilizing our extreme inclination to conform.
>
> It seems ego is the primary impetus to live and grow, so how could a world
> ever be without ego?
>
> Jamie
>
>
>
> --
> -Jamie
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttp-253A-252F-252Flistserv.jmu.edu-252Fcgi-2Dbin-252Fwa-253FSUBED1-253DTOK-2DSOCIETY-2DL-2526A-253D1-26data-3D04-257C01-257C-257Ca6495a4aa1eb4ce3b34c08d90b4b842f-257C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa-257C1-257C0-257C637553241229522916-257CUnknown-257CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0-253D-257C1000-26sdata-3DQgw0LOnB8Ml6-252FeqrHNX3jtGBUYkcgBsn-252FcPxPqRavC4-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMFAg&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=dEUCV2SBV14YMf5OAkcIU2GtdueIGZ5pH_wkxab0BcI&s=cYrnx3aQVm2EesqfdiKaVGDQtdwcsVRCJ27C4bn0pGw&e=>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2