Thank you. I'm writing a treatise on this inspired by our discussions that
is a little mind-blowing.

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:48 PM Bradley H. Werrell, D.O. <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Wonderful post by Jack.
>
> I particularly liked this element;
>
> We are shaved apes with self-referential G x E cognitive plasticities with
> emergences such as self awareness, culture, traditions, external memory
> devices (books etc) which also provide further E influences, and we are
> currently using the cognitive plasticities to try to understand them.
>
>
> I would hasten to edit only a little bit this quote, such that what Jack
> is calling "emergences" to be "emergencies," for it appears that such
> development is always associated with some crisis of being as manifest in
> our human condition.
>
> We are in one now.
>
>
> Bradley
>
>
>
>
> Bradley H. Werrell, D.O. - This email is private and copyrighted by the
> author.
>
> On Friday, September 25, 2020, 08:40:57 AM MST, James Lyons-Weiler <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
> Greg,
>
> I agree w/you.
>
> My interjection of course is not meant to replace or explain everything,
> evolutionary causes are not sufficient at all, but they are a necessary
> (but insufficient) starting place.
>
> I know you agree that ToK would be incomplete without evolutionary
> starting points.
>
> Our ancestral legacies, such as hormones, absolutely *influence* us and
> what can be studied at the higher levels.
>
> Most evolutionary biologists would not, I think, presume to think
> seriously that we are merely shaved apes.
>
> We're so much more than that.
>
> We are shaved apes with self-referential G x E cognitive plasticities with
> emergences such as self awareness, culture, traditions, external memory
> devices (books etc) which also provide further E influences, and we are
> currently using the cognitive plasticities to try to understand them.
>
> Our collective minds then become a landscape upon which a collective
> intelligence about the world (including ourselves); it is an evolving
> collective intelligence, fluid, subject to mutation and selection.   BIT
> and JUST are very useful and more general places within which this truth
> resides and bridge to societal tendencies and emergences.
>
> Another way to say this is that we really need to consider Cognitive
> Plastic Phenotype (CPP) = G x E^2
>
> At the same time, to me, ToK by definition is a beautiful and
> comprehensive *example* of those activities (unless you've had external
> influences you're not telling us about) :)   Philosophers of logic can have
> fun trying to reconcile how specific examples such as ToK can or cannot be
> explained by themselves; your invocation of non-theistic metaphysics gives
> hypothetical framework which also represents an example of the competing
> ideas residing in the collective intelligence, but to me it's not an
> escape.  I don't see ToK as tautological though-  because as any model
> approaches sufficiency and completeness, it often becomes indistinguishable
> from reality.
>
> Convergence of quantum mechanics reconciled with general relativity will
> also seem obvious (unless GR needs to be replaced with an update).
>
> Thus, well done!
>
> I imagine that a self-help book "Embrace The Shaved Ape Within You" would
> be fun.
>
> Jack
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:09 AM Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for this reply. This opens up a whole host of issues that I have
> long wrestled with, so I will not dive into the details.
>
>
>
> The short reply I will offer is that (a) evolutionary does provide an
> absolutely necessary lens to understand human behavior and (b) it is not
> straightforward to go from an evolutionary biological analysis to
> understanding human mental behavior.
>
>
>
> The reason why can be framed by the ToK System. You can’t just go from the
> second joint point (even a sophisticated evo devo synthesis) to human
> behavior without going through BIT first, then JUST. Even then you aren’t
> done, because you have grapple with fact-value issues. Steve Quackenbush
> will be talking about how the problem of value haunts psychology in a
> future TOK Community meeting.
>
>
>
> So, short answer is, yes, I agree it is crucial to have the lens, and it
> is also the case that it needs to be qualified by considerations that I
> generally find evolutionary biologists to be blind to. For example, Bret
> Weinstein, god love him, way over shoots in his analysis of the extend to
> which you can apply straight forward evolutionary biological thinking to
> things like religion. Once you get the JUST frame right, then you can see
> why analyses like his are, well, profoundly incomplete.
>
> For a few essays on evolutionary psychology, see here:
>
> First, on why, from a UTOK perspective, evo psych comes up short:
>
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201310_ep-2Dis-2Dnot-2Dviable-2Dintegrative-2Dmeta-2Dtheory&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=zISVxfZfm_nc3Oux8CwjikRA_CU5v5N1yr35aZGK-4M&e= 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201310_ep-2Dis-2Dnot-2Dviable-2Dintegrative-2Dmeta-2Dtheory&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=IsYUJOHIQE0sKFSNLW47nVdX6qgWbAj7Jsn9N5zK9yg&e=>
>
>
>
> a critique of my critique:
>
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_pop-2Dpsych_201310_evolutionary-2Dpsychology-2Dtying-2Dpsychology-2Dtogether&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=fWJm3Vugqt6vnw0uloSXc5Y_WqC3JbJsGWmJ8NgnhkE&e= 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_pop-2Dpsych_201310_evolutionary-2Dpsychology-2Dtying-2Dpsychology-2Dtogether&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=2hvuEvwlQklq0796MXr7iDHdzzOnG93vF14kCyWkCBk&e=>
>
>
>
> and my critique of that:
>
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201310_rhetoric-2Ddebate-2Dand-2Ddialogue-2Dabout-2Dep&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=Izo664KZriYjFB8Wx5hWQzcPcRhxah_NwhK6Dpy0Anc&e= 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201310_rhetoric-2Ddebate-2Dand-2Ddialogue-2Dabout-2Dep&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=joTLV5q7Oaxr22sNQRsP_kiSy9sJgKxpPCdKROK_3UU&e=>
>
>
>
> Best,
> Gregg
>
>
>
> *From:* tree of knowledge system discussion <
> [log in to unmask]>*On Behalf Of *James Lyons-Weiler
> *Sent:* Friday, September 25, 2020 8:32 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: Reevaluating Beliefs
>
>
>
> Quick evolutionary interjection Gregg-
>
>
>
> To me, it is utterly ironic that the brain that creates and conducts
> reason, science and logic seek hopelessly to apply the same
>
> set of mental frameworks to understand its own irrationality.  Achieving
> that goal is, at best, only sometimes possible.
>
>
>
> One way to make sense is to surmise that perhaps in many irrationalities
> there underlies a rationality that transcends our minds.
>
> An evolutionary explanation of  love, for example, by most seen as
> irrational, is pair-bonding that leads to survival of offspring.  Birds
> dancing in unison serves the same purpose and has no other rational
> explanation.
>
>
>
> So in couples' counseling, sometimes aggression/control can be seen as
> having, ultimately, a rational impetus as part of a
>
> genetic repertoire of behavioral options for spousal manipulation/control
> to reinforce the contract of the pair bond.  It is of course also
>
> rational to understand that alternative means may be more effective.
>
>
>
> I'm not sufficiently schooled in the history of evolutionary psychology to
> stand firm here on this, and the testability criticism weakness
> (appropriately) in  my view the "instant validation" of the evolutionary
> explanation, however, a systematic analysis of dysfunctional behavior that
>
> begins with the analysis of the couple as part of the larger sociological
> set to which they belong, and to the species to which they belong,
>
> tells us that as a bonded, married couple, they are best understood as
> being a couple that belongs to a species whose members not merely sometimes
> partake in serial monogamy, promiscuity, parental investment; that the two
> genders are expected to have different investment strategies, with
> distinctly different evolutionary stable strategies being expected in the
> gender, indeed the same person at different times in life,
>
> depending on many cues.
>
>
>
> It is not to belittle the human mind or the species to acknowledge the
> evolutionary legacy that gives us these complex organs a starting point.
>
>
>
> There is, then the reality that we recently have come through an amazing
> but shallow history shifting us from hunter/gatherer tribes in small
>
> populations to increasingly larger populations with a decreasing role of
> small group dynamics; potential mates are no longer rarer, and in our
> cognitive hyperplasticity phenotype we see that we are adaptable to new
> norms and laws so we can learn that wife-beating, for example, is wrong;
> society may provide alternative cues that tell men (or abusive women) that
> it's not unusual, and police responses can misguide men (or women) into a
> pattern by misaligning the cues to which they respond, triggering further
> abuse or dysfunction.  These environmental inputs matter more than defining
> situational context; they provide the E in the G x E interaction of human
> cognitive phenotypic hyperplasticity without resorting to reductionism.
>
>
>
> The phenotype of cognitive flexibility has a rational ultimate basis in
> evolution; those who fail to adapt to societal norms being taken out of the
> gene pool via imprisonment, death, shunning... we can begin to grasp a
> comprehension of the otherwise incomprehensible without for a moment saying
> that we are subject to any particular fate by our genes.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 7:51 AM Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Hi Lee,
>
>
>
>   My analysis of the BEVI is complicated. Moreover, I no longer work much
> with Craig Shealy, and I know it as evolved some, but I can’t really
> comment much on where it is or respond to these questions with any
> authority.
>
>
>
>  But I do have some thoughts about these issues. From where I sit (i.e.,
> my scientific, humanistic metapsychology theory of knowledge) I sometimes
> find that you attempt to apply a model of scientific realism to all domains
> of human belief, but that feels to me inadequate. Indeed, much of human
> activity, engagement, fighting about what is real, take place in domains
> that are not amenable to being analyzed via a scientific realist
> onto-epistemology. The reason is because the onto-epistemological
> belief-value subjective networks are all tied up with the issue at hand.
>
>
>
>  Here is blog that gets at what I mean that enters the world of couple’s
> therapy
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201504_your-2Dversion-2Dreality-2Dand-2Dmine&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=MBmX823KaeKpPx6fL78IBov0_rUZFhVCpLyk6dcYYtM&e=>.
> Note, it incorporates Shealy’s Version of Reality concept that was
> discussed in that paper.
>
>
>
>   I agree that a scientific realist onto-epistemology can provide a frame
> for the couple. But I don’t think it is adequate for much of the work. Take
> the husband’s claim: “You are a liar”. Is that a fact that corresponds to
> reality? I don’t think there is a simple answer here (e.g., a case could
> easily be made that the wife exaggerated and misrepresented and sometimes
> “lied”, but does that justify the trait-based claim? What is the reality
> here? It is not like the shape of the Earth). This is why I think you need
> more of a humanistic, values-based, relational developmental social
> construction of reality frame to deal with issues like this. The reality of
> the relationship is constructed by their actions and justifications. Thus,
> the observer of an independent reality that is the supposition of a
> scientific realism does not work very well in everyday, idiographic,
> interpersonal engagements. I am guessing that this is why the
> professional/practicing psychologists found your very interesting take to
> be insufficient to deal with the subjective and value-based intersubjective
> domains that are so apparent in the therapy room.
>
>
>
>   Love to get your take on this.
>
>
> Best,
> Gregg
>
>
>
> *From:* tree of knowledge system discussion <
> [log in to unmask]>*On Behalf Of *Leland Beaumont
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2020 11:50 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: Reevaluating Beliefs
>
>
>
> Thanks Rob,
>
> I enjoyed watching your google talks video (twice!) I am looking forward
> to your forum presentation.
>
>
>
> At 39:50 in the video you use the phrase “useful truth” and then go on to
> say that “truth is weird”.
>
>
>
> In my “seeking real good” talk I stated that “truth corresponds to
> reality”. I also mentioned that reality is vast, complex, and dynamic.
>
>
>
> When we get a chance, I would like to discuss the distinctions between
> “useful truth” and “correspondence to reality” especially in considering
> the question of “Where was Barack Obama born?”
>
>
>
> Gregg, thanks for the EI, BEVI paper; it is very helpful.
>
>
>
> I notice the paper lacks explicit reference to reality as a primary and
> unifying frame of reference for acquiring, assessing, and accepting or
> rejecting beliefs. On page 95 it is claimed the counselor has an “…ethical
> obligation to adopt client's values and beliefs.”  I argue there is an
> obligation (perhaps even more compelling) to assess and influence those
> beliefs toward true beliefs, consistent with our best understanding of
> reality. Also the 10 process scales from the BEVI lack an item for
> "cognitive contact with reality" – reflecting the relevance of empirical
> evidence in forming beliefs. (e.g. I believe the earth is nearly spherical
> because in fact (based on the correspondence to reality, learning that
> expert exploration of the earth provides representative evidence that the
> earth is nearly spherical) the earth*is *nearly spherical.) (P99) It also
> does not (explicitly) address "personal epistemology" –what is the process
> you use to choose your beliefs.
>
>
>
> Eric, thanks for identifying the importance of Post-Traumatic growth.
>
>
>
> Lee Beaumont
>
> *From:* tree of knowledge system discussion <
> [log in to unmask]>*On Behalf Of *easalien
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 22, 2020 6:16 PM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Reevaluating Beliefs
>
>
>
> Hey Leland, Having been on both sides of the equation, I can say change is
> often a response to trauma, real or perceived. It’s a form of adaptive
> behavior driven by adverse circumstances. Very rarely do comfortable people
> change.
>
>
>
> Most of you I’m sure have heard of PTSD. The other side of that is
> Post-Traumatic Growth. This article sums it up nicely:
>
>
>
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__blogs.scientificamerican.com_beautiful-2Dminds_post-2Dtraumatic-2Dgrowth-2Dfinding-2Dmeaning-2Dand-2Dcreativity-2Din-2Dadversity_&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=2GMyYKVx0UFBFvcEOrOucWfNZRuox_aeVLyOeQX8mM8&e= 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__blogs.scientificamerican.com_beautiful-2Dminds_post-2Dtraumatic-2Dgrowth-2Dfinding-2Dmeaning-2Dand-2Dcreativity-2Din-2Dadversity_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=FE9YjbAkxcapLo-BOfWURIZDgaGBWZfogomrcPeIbAA&s=4tUV_boJFf2CL2mhoj_hZSXigbj4OUass2CL2U93atY&e=>
>
>
>
> With the clusterf*ck that is 2020, cherished beliefs are challenged and
> people are retreating into entrenched ideologies or opening up to the
> truth, which must be experienced a posteriori. Otherwise, it’s like a
> scholar “explaining” war to a veteran. It rings hollow.
>
>
>
> Personally, abandoning unverified belief in exchange for verifiable truth
> has brought a remarkable sense of balance. It’s taught me empathy and
> gratitude as well as peace with uncertainty. With the world as it is, maybe
> we need to take our philosophy and let it go.
>
>
>
> Eric S.
>
>
> On Thursday, September 17, 2020, Leland Beaumont <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> ToK Forum Members,
>
> Intrigued by questions that were raised when I presented Seeking Real Good
> to this forum, I am researching the topic of “Reexamining Beliefs”. I have
> recently read several books that pertain to forming beliefs and defending
> long-held beliefs. What I am still curious to understand is the triggers
> and introspective processes that result in people changing deeply held
> beliefs. For example, why do some people reflect on their religious beliefs
> and become non-theists? Why do people switch political parties, what
> triggers the shift from “love you forever” to “divorce you now”, why did
> some people shift from never Trump to Trump forever while Michael Cohen
> turned against him? Why do some people leave cults and others double down?
> What attracts people toward conspiracy theories and then what changes that
> causes people to abandon those theories?
>
>
>
> I would like to be able to describe a process each of us would be
> motivated to use to reexamine our beliefs and progress toward true beliefs.
>
>
>
> I will appreciate it if you can recommend reliable references on this
> topic.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Lee Beaumont
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ############################
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
>
> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>
> or click the following link:
>
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
>
>
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ---
> james lyons-weiler, phd
>
> Author, CEO, President, Scientist
>
> Editor-in-Chief, Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=nHhodjDhtmtNGRGTfUja_JESJn1cJTR7toW8xLp3NKc&e=>
>
> Guest Contributor, Children's Health Defense
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__childrenshealthdefense.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=PRu-a5wDr2iXic9zuqOzzlz6wBxnMcLkumaz4Z7L5VA&e=>
>
>
>
> The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1KNSxPp&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=fkWiuSIci7kBRcvjpA88YIhqcsd_BssV-AvpxG6Dy9k&e=>
> (Skyhorse Publishing)
>
> Cures vs. Profits: Successes in Translational Research
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.amazon.com_gp_product_9814730149_ref-3Das-5Fli-5Fqf-5Fsp-5Fasin-5Fil-5Ftl-3Fie-3DUTF8-26camp-3D1789-26creative-3D9325-26creativeASIN-3D9814730149-26linkCode-3Das2-26tag-3Dlivgrelivwel-2D20&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=FlDBIYP4ysnE6C5B6fFXR32RoMdH6KrmeaDLWYj4Uok&e=> (World
> Scientific, 2016)
>
> Ebola: An Evolving Story
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1TGYY9r&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=77J4lhTu7CsgDk_qKxCklrFy3o0cut8DKig1YKw98rc&e=>
> (World Scientific, 2015)
>
> cell 412-728-8743
> email [log in to unmask]
> www.*linkedin*.com/in/*jameslyonsweiler*
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jameslyonsweiler&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=lGV2aRt7fPwRrNCG-kc63o9zY14tk_pz9m6Crl8ymbg&e=>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] click the
> following link:http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
>
>
> --
> ---
> james lyons-weiler, phd
> Author, CEO, President, Scientist
> Editor-in-Chief, Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=83_oSYU27XqLnf9yqzfAsLaNcZ_zuP-LA70_P2r3QRg&e=>
> Guest Contributor, Children's Health Defense
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__childrenshealthdefense.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=91JY9bY6FN6tPlwoeQfvVBxi_aLKQt6XhWYXSVjIJQU&e=>
>
> The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1KNSxPp&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=nPS92YqV9GsOCZms6pONmGvkpbnUM4zX7opAXbtN-hk&e=>
> (Skyhorse Publishing)
> Cures vs. Profits: Successes in Translational Research
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.amazon.com_gp_product_9814730149_ref-3Das-5Fli-5Fqf-5Fsp-5Fasin-5Fil-5Ftl-3Fie-3DUTF8-26camp-3D1789-26creative-3D9325-26creativeASIN-3D9814730149-26linkCode-3Das2-26tag-3Dlivgrelivwel-2D20&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=0tbW9v-IK64MGijZ5dxmvHqQco5krJAkB3pr41V6yoU&e=> (World
> Scientific, 2016)
> Ebola: An Evolving Story
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1TGYY9r&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=coQ7Sb_eM2n6951CHuF71k1mGAR06yZWtsSed5_5eHg&e=>
> (World Scientific, 2015)
> cell 412-728-8743
> email [log in to unmask]
> www.*linkedin*.com/in/*jameslyonsweiler*
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jameslyonsweiler&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=JZWAEHzD-x1QObt6KO3zSaCMN4V0Cfb1cjX6hdd-PoM&e=>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] click the
> following link:http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>


-- 
---
james lyons-weiler, phd
Author, CEO, President, Scientist
Editor-in-Chief, Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com_&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=LMab95YMd02BTADLoD95raoq8669l1Wuv4xeWRAhv4s&e= >
Guest Contributor, Children's Health Defense
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__childrenshealthdefense.org&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=7JNgFGyG3jJ6CfkcMBI5szghQ5Fzg9xvXj4QCoXBNz4&e= >

The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1KNSxPp&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=bry_QVBv49D1OoWNFMfUHCKYqeEcuwBma9e5GGl9CiE&e= >
(Skyhorse Publishing)
Cures vs. Profits: Successes in Translational Research
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.amazon.com_gp_product_9814730149_ref-3Das-5Fli-5Fqf-5Fsp-5Fasin-5Fil-5Ftl-3Fie-3DUTF8-26camp-3D1789-26creative-3D9325-26creativeASIN-3D9814730149-26linkCode-3Das2-26tag-3Dlivgrelivwel-2D20&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=aeST6O7rAMxM8mT3o5Po7eT2sFof6fgxzZ-LGi8VqO0&e= >
(World
Scientific, 2016)
Ebola: An Evolving Story <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1TGYY9r&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=OK_3NYJPpX4m6Haw8eu6cRk8OJFYd_xDGy4lXwqicWw&e= > (World Scientific, 2015)
cell 412-728-8743
email [log in to unmask]
www.*linkedin*.com/in/*jameslyonsweiler*
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jameslyonsweiler&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=6EbYjMdORVRwAGaHIXHuBoWn1Ei5QO5wqsUU7WG5GJ4&e= >

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1